Jerusalem Day - Who's the real occupier?

The mainstream media will tell you a bizarre story about Israel "occupying" places called "The West Bank" and "East Jerusalem" in 1967. It'll tell you this story with a straight face, without blinking once. Not for a second will it touch such "minor" details like, west of what is this "West Bank" to be called thus, or whom did Israel "occupy" these places from? Nor will it naturally, mention the "West Bank's" historic names - Judea and Samaria. If it did, a significant percentage of viewers might have actually risen an eyebrow, because the idea of JEWS "occupying" a place called JUDEA sounds a little bit weird.

The real story, however, is surprisingly simple and quite recent:

1. In 1947 the UN issued the Partition Plan for The British Mandate of Palestine to divide it into two separate states: A Jewish one and an Arab one.

*Notice how it was perfectly clear to all just a few years back, that Jews ARE a people, treated in the same context as the Arabs, unlike what some post-modern "thinkers" will tell you today. 
Notice also there's no mention of a "Palestinian" people, only an Arab people. Instead, Palestine is mentioned simply as a geographical region.

2. The Jews said "Yes!", the Arabs said "No!".

3. The Jews went on to establish an independant state in 1948 in what little was given to them. The Arabs attacked the tiny, newborn Jewish state with overwhelming powers of 5 Arab countries.

4. The Arabs, to their great surprise, lost (bringing upon themselves their infamous "Naqba", but that's a different story altogether). That first war of self-defence ended in 1949, with Israel prevailing and improving its border position.

5. Jordan ended up occupying the "West Bank" in that war of Arab aggression (hence the name, referring to it from Jordan's point of view). That occupation was almost unanimously viewed upon as illegal, even by the Arab League, since Jordan never had any legal, historical or other claim on the territory.

7. Israel was left with an indefensible border, only 9 miles long (!), so it had to go into battle once again in the triumphant Six-Day War of 1967, liberating Judea and Samaria from the illegal Jordanian occupation.

*Notice how the infamous, disputed "67 borders" from today's discourse, should actually be called the "49 borders". Or at least the "pre-67 borders".

And that's pretty much it. Jerusalem was once again, after some 2,000 years, a united capital (no such thing as "East Jerusalem", the city is united) of the Jewish people. This is the holiday of Jerusalem Day. Only the Jews, not the Arabs, were ever historically independent in Jerusalem. Only the Jews, not the Arabs, had Jerusalem for their capital. Only the Jewish Bible, not the Muslim Quran, mentions Jerusalem hundreds of times. Only the Jews prayed for "next year in Jerusalem", not the Muslims.

And yet, this Jerusalem Day, is particularly sad. To appease the Arabs control of the Temple Mount, the holiest Jewish site, was given away to Jordanian Waqf. They limit the access of non-Muslims (that includes tourists) to the site for three to four hours a day, 5 days a week, while Muslims are free to visit whenever they want. They shut the entrance to non-Muslims entirely whenever they feel like rioting, or just have a bad mood. Like today on Jerusalem Day.

And you'll ask me: "But isn't the Temple Mount sacred for the Muslims as well?" "Shouldn't they have control because of it?" "Shouldn't we respect their ancient traditions?"

1. Muslims turn their asses to Jerusalem when they pray. Their true holy city is Mecca.

2. When the latest conflict escalated they shot missiles upon their "holy city" of Jerusalem.

3. The Western Wall is sacred to the Jews, yet access is free to all. The Church of The Holy Sepulchre is sacred to the Christians, yet access is free to all. Why do you want to hold the Muslims to a different standart? Are you some kind of a racist?

This shocking video was taken only a month ago. Not 47 years ago when we didn't have Jerusalem, not 66 years ago when we didn't have a country, not 75 years ago in Europe. Now. Here. In Jerusalem. Only a month ago. A crazed, Arab mob attacks a Jewish family (with little kids). The police could hardly protect them.

Apartheid anyone?

The only way for peace, quiet, full human and religious rights to all is through full Israeli sovereignty.

Until that is realized by all, it's more like "next year in Jerusalem" all over again.

Happy holiday!

Tweet

Evil IDF slaughters poor innocent teens!!! The farce continues

The carnival of hypocrisy continues! The Arabs with the help of the ultra-left Israeli organisation 'B'Tselem' (or is it the other way around?) fuel the international media with a completely bogus story, which only purpose is to slander and demonize the IDF. The CNN merrily jumps on board, purporting with their recent coverage to reveal the "smoking gun" of the incident - that of an IDF soldier. His "live" bullet, according to the Arabs' claim, hits the first teen, passes through him, hits his backpack, passes through that and then gets out.

http://edition.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/world/2014/05/22/pkg-watson-4a-west-bank-teens-shot.cnn.html

Yet, CNN, while remaining completely ignorant, prove quite the opposite:

1. In a pathetic display of absolute professional incompetence, they fail to recognise the gun used by the Israeli soldier has a thickened barrel, which is used to fire rubber bullets, not live ammunition. This supports the IDF claim, that no live ammunition was used in Beitunia. And while a rubber bullet can certainly hurt a lot, and even kill at certain unfortunate occasions, performing all those wonderful feats mentioned above, is completely beyond its capability.

2. The supposed "father" of the "victim" goes out of his way and shows CNN the live bullet that "hit his son". The gullible CNN reporter eats it all up. He never realizes that any bullet that actually hits a target gets deformed and misshapen by the hit. The "father's" bullet, however, is flawless.

Did we mention incompetence already?
If you don't take my word for it, here, listen to a professional:

3. And last but not least: The alleged IDF "killer" in CNN footage is located on higher ground about 80 meters from the alleged "target". Alas, the original Arab reports claimed that the shooting came from a completely different spot 200 meters away. Oops!

And now, with all those new dramatic turns, looking again at the original video, new questions arise:

1. Why does the first dramatic teen fall against the direction of the supposed impact?

2. How come both different teens, falling differently and hit differently, end up in the exact same position on the back with one hand across the belly?

3. Why not on this video, nor on any other documentation of the incident is there any blood? The bullet did go through them, tearing up both back and chest, right?

The IDF, due to its formal position and because of public opinion, must mumble in return to this obvious fraud. So do the rest of the official Israeli bodies and media. They all agree to label the incident a "real incident". The only argument they allow themselves is that of versions: rubber vs live. They're not free to call a spade a spade.

You, however, are not bound by such weight. You can see a "father" blatantly lying to international cameras and call him a liar. You can see a sloppy 'Pallywood' staged act and call it BS. You don't have to be ashamed or afraid of the truth. You can speak up.

There probably are two corpses. They probably have been shot. But we have no idea how, when or by whom have they been shot. This should be investigated. We do know, for a fact, clearly and unquestionably, that the teens from infamous incident are alive and well. And we have no reason to pretend otherwise.

P.S.

If you think, staging an entire play for the world media is too much of a conspiracy theory, watch this video by professor Richard Landes from Boston University, who revealed the 'Pallywood' method back in 2008.

Tweet

IDF unlawfully killed two Palestinian teens!... OR DID IT?!?

The newest addition to the hot "Israel kills children" libel seems to be that lovely YouTube video, that proves beyond any reasonable doubt, how Israel systematically shoots innocent Palestinian children...

Or Does it?

Lets see the video and check exactly what it is, that we see:

1. We are being told to brace ourselves, for what we're about to see is extremely shocking, "graphic content".

2. Then we are carefully told and explained, what it is exactly that we're about to see.

3. We are shown an interview with an anonymous dude, telling a story. He's the only one we hear throughout the entire video.

4. We see the "innocent teens"... rioting and throwing rocks?!? Oh, but then, we're carefully explained that the minute they're actually "shot", they weren't doing that. Oh, okay, then!

5. We see a teen falling to the ground in the most dramatic, theatrical and overracted way, any "gunned down" teen ever fell.

6. We don't see IDF. We don't see blood. We don't see wounds. We don't hear gunfire. In fact, no "graphic content" at all!

(Cause it's a "security video"! Oh, yes, of course!)

7. The moment the teen falls a crowd of bystanders rushes "for help", crowding and surrounding the "wounded victim" in a highly irrational, frantic and messy manner. Completely disregarding the threat of a "crazed-out IDF soldier" "firing" at them. No one attempts to hide. No one attempts to take shelter. No one fears more bullets.

8. Steps 5-7 repeat for the second teen.

Pallywood much?

Now, just how low an IQ does one need to have, to actually fall for this kind of BS?

FYI, when I brought up these points in the comment section of the video on YouTube, the comments quickly became disabled.

When I did the same on a certain girl's Facebook Arabic teaching page, my comment was deleted and I was blocked from commenting on the page again.

Just saying...

So here you have it! Uncensored and uncut!

Never forget to use your eyes and brains!

Cheers!